Workflow

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

Expert guidance for creating, building, and using Claude Code subagents and the Task tool. Use when working with subagents, setting up agent configurations, understanding how agents work, or using the Task tool to launch specialized agents.

Create hierarchical project plans optimized for solo agentic development. Use when planning projects, phases, or tasks that Claude will execute. Produces Claude-executable plans with verification criteria, not enterprise documentation. Handles briefs, roadmaps, phase plans, and context handoffs.

Expert guidance for creating, configuring, and using Claude Code hooks. Use when working with hooks, setting up event listeners, validating commands, automating workflows, adding notifications, or understanding hook types (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SessionStart, UserPromptSubmit, etc).

Expert guidance for creating, writing, building, and refining Claude Code Skills. Use when working with SKILL.md files, authoring new skills, improving existing skills, or understanding skill structure and best practices.

Skills wiki intro - mandatory workflows, search tool, brainstorming triggers

Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, or verify PR readiness. Fetches comments via GitHub CLI, classifies by severity, applies fixes with user confirmation, commits with proper format, replies to threads.

Creates git commits following Conventional Commits format with type/scope/subject. Use when user wants to commit changes, create commit, save work, or stage and commit. Handles regular branch commits (development) and merge commits (PR closure). Enforces project-specific conventions from CLAUDE.md.